[Federal Register: December 16, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 241)]
[Notices]
[Page 77044-77053]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr16de02-32]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-201-820]
Suspension of Antidumping Investigation: Fresh Tomatoes From
Mexico
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of suspension of antidumping investigation on fresh
tomatoes from Mexico.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
EFFECTIVE DATE: December 16, 2002.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce has suspended the antidumping
investigation involving fresh tomatoes from Mexico. The basis for the
suspension of the antidumping investigation is an agreement between the
Department of Commerce and producers/exporters accounting for
substantially all imports of fresh tomatoes from Mexico wherein each
signatory producer/exporter has agreed to revise its prices to
eliminate completely the injurious effects of exports of this
merchandise to the United States.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Ross or Janis Kalnins at (202)
482-4794 or (202) 482-1393, respectively; Office of AD/CVD Enforcement
3, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution Avenue, NW,
Washington, DC, 20230.
[[Page 77045]]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Applicable Statute and Regulations
Unless otherwise indicated, all citations to the statute are
references to the provisions effective January 1, 1995, the effective
date of the amendments made to the Tariff Act of 1930 (the Act) by the
Uruguay Round Agreements Act. In addition, unless otherwise indicated,
all citations to Department of Commerce (Department) regulations refer
to the regulations codified at 19 CFR part 353 (1996).
Background
On April 18, 1996, the Department initiated an antidumping
investigation to determine whether imports of fresh tomatoes from
Mexico are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States at
less than fair value (LTFV) (61 FR 18377, April 25, 1996). On May 16,
1996, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) notified the
Department of its affirmative preliminary injury determination.
On October 10, 1996, the Department and Mexican tomato growers/
exporters initialed a proposed agreement to suspend the antidumping
investigation. On October 28, 1996, the Department preliminarily
determined that imports of fresh tomatoes from Mexico are being sold at
LTFV in the United States. See Notice of Preliminary Determination of
Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Postponement of Final Determination:
Fresh Tomatoes from Mexico, 61 FR 56607 (November 1, 1996) (Preliminary
Determination). On the same day on which the Department issued the
Preliminary Determination, the Department and certain growers/exporters
of fresh tomatoes from Mexico signed an agreement to suspend the
investigation (1996 Suspension Agreement). See Suspension of
Antidumping Investigation: Fresh Tomatoes from Mexico, 61 FR 56618
(November 1, 1996).
On May 31, 2002, Mexican tomato growers/exporters accounting for a
significant percentage of all fresh tomatoes imported into the United
States from Mexico provided written notice to the Department of their
withdrawal from the 1996 Suspension Agreement on fresh tomatoes from
Mexico. Because the 1996 Suspension Agreement no longer covered
substantially all imports of fresh tomatoes from Mexico, effective July
30, 2002, the Department terminated the 1996 Suspension Agreement,
terminated the sunset review of the suspended investigation, and
resumed the antidumping investigation. See Notice of Termination of
Suspension Agreement, Termination of Sunset Review, and Resumption of
Antidumping Investigation: Fresh Tomatoes from Mexico, 67 FR 50858
(August 6, 2002). With the termination of the 1996 Suspension
Agreement, in accordance with section 734(i)(1)(B) of the Act, the
Department resumed the underlying antidumping investigation.
On November 8, 2002, the Department and Mexican tomato growers/
exporters initialed a proposed agreement suspending the resumed
antidumping investigation on imports of fresh tomatoes from Mexico. The
Department provided parties an opportunity to submit comments on the
initialed agreement, and on November 22, 2002, the Department received
comments from several parties. The memorandum titled ``Comments on the
Proposed Agreement Suspending the Antidumping Duty Investigation'' from
Mark Ross, Program Manager, to the File explains the Department's
response to these comments.
On December 4, 2002, the Department and certain growers/exporters
of fresh tomatoes from Mexico signed a new suspension agreement (2002
Suspension Agreement). The 2002 Suspension Agreement is attached to
this notice of Suspension of Antidumping Investigation.
Scope Clarification
On September 30, 1996, Desert Glory, Ltd. (Desert Glory), filed a
letter requesting that the Department exclude cocktail tomatoes from
the scope of the investigation. The petitioners responded to Desert
Glory's letter on October 10, 1996, clarifying that the petition's
scope did not include cocktail tomatoes. In the Preliminary
Determination, the Department excluded cocktail tomatoes from the scope
of the investigation.
On September 17, 2002, the petitioners filed a letter requesting
the withdrawal of their October 10, 1996, scope-clarification letter
and encouraged the Department to exercise its own authority to clarify
the scope of the investigation so that it includes cocktail tomatoes.
On November 15, 2002, the Department released a draft scope-
clarification memorandum to the parties to the proceeding to
communicate the Department's intent to include cocktail tomatoes in the
scope of the investigation and give the parties the opportunity to
present their views on this intention.
On November 20, 2002, Desert Glory submitted comments on the draft
scope-clarification memorandum, and on November 25, 2002, the
petitioners submitted rebuttal comments. After analysis of these
comments and the information on the record, the Department determined
to include cocktail tomatoes within the scope of the investigation. See
December 4, 2002, memorandum entitled ``Scope Clarification'' from
Laurie Parkhill, Office Director, to Faryar Shirzad, Assistant
Secretary for Import Administration, available in the Central Records
Unit, Room B-099 of the main building of the Commerce Department.
Suspension of Investigation
The Department consulted with the parties to the proceeding and has
considered the comments submitted with respect to the proposal to
suspend the antidumping investigation. In accordance with section
734(c) of the Act, we have determined that extraordinary circumstances
are present in this case, as defined by section 734(c)(2)(A) of the
Act. See the memorandum titled ``Existence of Extraordinary
Circumstances'' from Laurie Parkhill, Office Director, to Faryar
Shirzad, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
The 2002 Suspension Agreement provides that the subject merchandise
will be sold at or above the established reference price and, for each
entry of each exporter, the amount by which the estimated normal value
exceeds the export price (or constructed export price) will not exceed
15 percent of the weighted-average amount by which the estimated normal
value exceeded the export price (or constructed export price) for all
LTFV entries of the producer/exporter examined during the course of the
investigation. We have determined that the 2002 Suspension Agreement
will eliminate completely the injurious effect of exports to the United
States of the subject merchandise and prevent the suppression or
undercutting of price levels of domestic fresh tomatoes by imports of
that merchandise from Mexico.
We have also determined that the 2002 Suspension Agreement is in
the public interest and can be monitored effectively, as required under
section 734(d) of the Act. See the memorandum titled ``Public Interest
Assessment of the Agreement Suspending the Antidumping Duty
Investigation on Fresh Tomatoes from Mexico'' from Jeffrey May,
Director of the Office of Policy, to Faryar Shirzad, Assistant
Secretary for Import Administration.
For the reasons outlined above, we find that the 2002 Suspension
Agreement meets the criteria of section 734(c) of the Act.
[[Page 77046]]
International Trade Commission
In accordance with section 733(f) of the Act, the Department has
notified the ITC of the 2002 Suspension Agreement.
Suspension of Liquidation
The suspension of liquidation ordered in the preliminary
affirmative determination in this case published on November 1, 1996,
and resumed on August 6, 2002 (see 67 FR 50858), shall continue to be
in effect, subject to section 734(h)(3) of the Act. Section
734(f)(2)(B) of the Act provides that the Department may adjust the
security required to reflect the effect of the 2002 Suspension
Agreement. The Department has found that the 2002 Suspension Agreement
eliminates completely the injurious effects of imports and, thus, the
Department is adjusting the security required from signatories to zero.
The security rates in effect for imports from non-signatory growers
remain as published in the Preliminary Determination.
Notwithstanding the 2002 Suspension Agreement, the Department will
continue the investigation if it receives such a request within 20 days
after the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register,
in accordance with section 734(g) of the Act.
Enforcement
To ensure effective enforcement of the 2002 Suspension Agreement,
the Department worked closely with the U.S. Customs Service in drafting
the terms of the 2002 Suspension Agreement. Pursuant to its obligations
under section 734(i) of the Act, the U.S. Customs Service has informed
the Department that it concurs with the enforcement provisions the
Department included in the 2002 Suspension Agreement.
Administrative Protective Order Access
The Administrative Protective Orders (APOs) the Department granted
in the original investigation segment of this proceeding remain in
place. While the investigation is suspended, parties subject to those
APOs may retain, but may not use, information received under those
APOs. All parties wishing access to business proprietary information
submitted during the administration of the 2002 Suspension Agreement
must submit new APO applications. An APO for the administration of the
2002 Suspension Agreement will be placed on the record within five days
of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register.
We are publishing this notice in accordance with section 734 of the
Act and 19 CFR 353.18.
Dated: December 10, 2002.
Faryar Shirzad,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
December 4, 2002 Agreement
Suspension of Antidumping Investigation: Fresh Tomatoes from Mexico
Pursuant to section 734(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 1673c(c)) (``the Act''), and section 353.18 of the U.S.
Department of Commerce (``the Department'') regulations (19 C.F.R.
353.18), the Department and the signatory producers/exporters of
fresh tomatoes from Mexico enter into this Suspension Agreement (the
``Agreement''). On the basis of this Agreement, the Department shall
suspend its antidumping duty investigation, the initiation of which
was published on April 25, 1996 (61 FR 18377), with respect to fresh
tomatoes from Mexico, subject to the terms and provisions set out
below.
I. Product Coverage
The merchandise subject to this Agreement is all fresh or
chilled tomatoes (fresh tomatoes) which have Mexico as their origin,
except for those tomatoes which are for processing. For purposes of
this Agreement, processing is defined to include preserving by any
commercial process, such as canning, dehydrating, drying, or the
addition of chemical substances, or converting the tomato product
into juices, sauces, or purees. In Appendix F of this Agreement the
Department has outlined the procedure that signatories must follow
for selling subject merchandise for processing. Fresh tomatoes that
are imported for cutting up, not further processing (e.g., tomatoes
used in the preparation of fresh salsa or salad bars), are covered
by this Agreement.
Commercially grown tomatoes, both for the fresh market and for
processing, are classified as Lycopersicon esculentum. Important
commercial varieties of fresh tomatoes include common round, cherry,
grape, plum, greenhouse, and pear tomatoes, all of which are covered
by this Agreement.
Tomatoes imported from Mexico covered by this Agreement are
classified under the following subheadings of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedules of the United States (HTSUS), according to the season of
importation: 0702 and 9906.07.01 through 9906.07.09. Although the
HTSUS numbers are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the scope of this Agreement is dispositive.
II. U.S. Import Coverage
The signatories are the producers and exporters in Mexico which
account for substantially all of the subject merchandise imported
into the United States. The Department may at any time during the
period of the Agreement require additional producers/exporters in
Mexico to sign the Agreement in order to ensure that not less than
substantially all imports into the United States are subject to the
Agreement.
III. Basis for the Agreement
Each signatory individually agrees that, in order to prevent
price suppression or undercutting, it will not sell, on and after
the effective date of the Agreement, merchandise subject to the
Agreement at prices that are less than the reference price, in
accordance with Appendix A to this Agreement.
In order to satisfy the requirements of section 734(c)(1)(B) of
the Act, each signatory agrees individually that for each entry the
amount by which the estimated normal value exceeds the export price
(or the constructed export price) will not exceed 15 percent of the
weighted-average amount by which the estimated normal value exceeded
the export price (or the constructed export price) for all less-
than-fair-value entries of the producer/exporter examined during the
course of the investigation, in accordance with the calculation
methodologies described in Appendix B of this Agreement.
IV. Monitoring of the Agreement
A. Import Monitoring
1. The Department will monitor entries of fresh tomatoes from
Mexico to ensure compliance with section III. of this Agreement.
2. The Department will review publicly available data and other
official import data, including, as appropriate, records maintained
by the U.S. Customs Service, to determine whether there have been
imports that are inconsistent with the provisions of this Agreement.
B. Compliance Monitoring
1. The Department may require, and each signatory agrees to
provide, confirmation, through documentation provided to the
Department, that the price received on any sale subject to this
Agreement was not less than the established reference price. The
Department may require that such documentation be provided, and be
subject to verification, within thirty days of the sale.
2. The Department may require, and each signatory agrees to
report in the prescribed format and using the prescribed method of
data compilation, each sale of the merchandise subject to this
Agreement, either directly or indirectly to unrelated purchasers in
the United States, including each adjustment applicable to each
sale, as specified by the Department.
Each signatory agrees to permit review and on-site inspection of
all information deemed necessary by the Department to verify the
reported information.
3. The Department may conduct administrative reviews under
section 751 of the Act, upon request or upon its own initiative, to
ensure that exports of fresh tomatoes from Mexico are at prices
consistent with the terms of this Agreement. The Department may
perform verifications pursuant to administrative reviews conducted
under section 751 of the Act.
4. At any time and without prior notice, the Department may
conduct verifications of parties handling signatory merchandise to
determine whether they are selling signatory merchandise in
accordance with the terms of this Agreement.
[[Page 77047]]
C. Shipping and Other Arrangements
1. All reference prices will be expressed in U.S.$/lb. in
accordance with Appendix A of this Agreement. Subject to paragraph
24 of Annex 703.2 of the North American Free Trade Agreement, the
quality of each entry of fresh tomatoes exported to the United
States from Mexico will conform with any applicable U.S. Department
of Agriculture minimum grade, size, and/or quality import
requirements in effect.
2. Signatories agree not to circumvent the Agreement and to
undertake measures that will help to prevent circumvention. For
example, each signatory will take the following actions:
a. It is the responsibility of all signatories to ensure that
sales of their merchandise are made consistent with the requirements
of this Agreement. To that end, each signatory shall enter into a
contract, with the party that is responsible for the first sale of
its subject merchandise to an unaffiliated customer in the United
States (the Selling Agent),\1\ that incorporates the terms of this
Agreement. Through a contractual arrangement signatories shall also
require the Selling Agent establish a contract with third parties to
ensure that adjustments for spoilage or other claims inconsistent
with the Agreement will not be permitted. Further, this contractual
arrangement must establish that the Selling Agent maintain
documentation demonstrating that sales of their merchandise are made
consistent with the requirements of this Agreement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Selling Agent can be an importer, agent, broker,
distributor, or any other entity that facilitates the transaction
between the signatory and the first unaffiliated U.S. customer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
b. Each signatory will label its boxes of subject merchandise
that are exported to the United States with its name, signatory
identification number, and a statement that ``These Tomatoes Were
Grown/Exported by a Signatory of the December 2002 Suspension
Agreement.'' Alternatively, if the signatory that exports the
tomatoes is different from the entity that grew the tomatoes, it
will label the boxes with its name and its signatory identification
number.
c. Each signatory will label its boxes of fresh tomatoes sold in
Mexico with its name and the title ``Prohibida Su Exportacion.''
3. Not later than thirty days after each quarter, each signatory
will submit a written statement to the Department certifying that
all sales during the most recently completed quarter were at net
prices (after rebates, backbilling, discounts for quality and other
claims) at or above the reference price and were not part of or
related to any act or practice which would have the effect of hiding
the real price of the fresh tomatoes being sold (e.g., a bundling
arrangement, discounts/free goods/financing package, swap, or other
exchange). Each signatory agrees to permit full verification of its
certification as the Department deems necessary.
D. Rejection of Submissions
The Department may reject: 1) Any information submitted after
the deadlines set forth in this Agreement; 2) any submission that
does not comply with the filing, format, translation, service, and
certification of documents requirements under 19 CFR 353.31; 3)
submissions that do not comply with the procedures for establishing
business proprietary treatment under 19 CFR 353.32 or any
information that it is unable to verify to its satisfaction. If
information is not submitted in a complete and timely fashion or is
not fully verifiable, the Department may use the facts otherwise
available for the basis of its decision, as it determines
appropriate, unless the Department determines that section V.
applies.
E. Compliance Consultations
1. When the Department identifies, through import or compliance
monitoring or otherwise, that sales may have been made at prices
inconsistent with section III. of this Agreement, the Department
will notify each signatory which it believes is responsible or, if
applicable, notify the signatory's representative. The Department
will consult with each such party for a period of up to sixty days
to establish a factual basis regarding sales that may be
inconsistent with section III. of this Agreement.
2. During the consultation period, the Department will examine
any information that it develops or which is submitted, including
information requested by the Department under sections IV.A. and B.
above.
F. Review
If the Department is not satisfied at the conclusion of the
consultation period that sales by such signatory are being made in
compliance with this Agreement, the Department may conduct a review
to determine whether this Agreement is being violated by such
signatory. This provision does not limit or restrict the
Department's authority to conduct an administrative review under
section 751 of the Act and paragraph IV.B.3. of this Agreement.
G. Operations Consultations
The Department will consult with the signatory producers/
exporters regarding the operations of this Agreement. A party to the
Agreement may request such consultations in any April or September
(i.e., prior to the beginning of each season) following the first
year of the signing of this Agreement.
In order to evaluate whether this Agreement fulfills the
requirements of section 734(c)(1)(A) of the Act (prevents the
suppression or undercutting of price levels of domestic products by
imports of fresh tomatoes), within 30 days from the date this
Agreement is signed the Department will begin to analyze historical
price and shipment volume data from certain U.S. and Mexican
producers of fresh tomatoes. The Department will also gather such
information concerning prices and shipment volumes experienced
during the first four months of this Agreement and any other
information the Department believes pertinent to its analysis.
The Department expects to make an adjustment to the reference
price to take into account such events as significant changes in the
relationship of domestic prices and volumes to import prices and
volumes. In evaluating the significance of any change, the
Department will look both to the extent of the change and its
duration. For example, a very high percentage change in the
relationship may be significant even though it occurs over a brief
time period.
The information gathered will be subject to release under
administrative protective order and to comment by interested
parties. Where appropriate, the information will also be subject to
verification. The Department will complete its evaluation of this
information by July 31, 2003, and will release the results of its
analysis for comment. The Department will issue the final results of
its analysis by October 1, 2003. The Department will post any
revision to the reference price to its Web site (http://www.ia.ita.doc.gov/tomato
), and any such revision will take effect
on November 1, 2003.
In order to evaluate whether this Agreement fulfills the
requirements of section 734(c)(1)(B) of the Act, the Department may
conduct an administrative review under section 751 of the Act, upon
request or upon its own initiative, to ensure that for each entry of
each exporter the amount by which the estimated normal value exceeds
the export price (or the constructed export price) did not exceed 15
percent of the weighted-average amount by which the estimated normal
value exceeded the export price (or the constructed export price)
for all less-than-fair-value entries of the producer/exporter
examined during the course of the investigation, in accordance with
the calculation methodologies described in Appendix B. An
affirmative determination under section 751 of the Act may result in
the termination of this Agreement.
V. Violations of the Agreement
A. If the Department determines that the Agreement is being or
has been violated or no longer meets the requirements of sections
734(c) or (d) of the Act, the Department shall take action it
determines appropriate under section 734(i) of the Act and the
Department's regulations.
B. Pursuant to section 734(i) of the Act the Department will
refer any intentional violations of the Agreement to the U.S.
Customs Service. Any person who intentionally violates the Agreement
shall be subject to a civil penalty assessed in the same amount, in
the same manner, and under the same procedures as the penalty
imposed for a fraudulent violation of section 592(a) of the Act. A
fraudulent violation of section 592(a) of the Act is punishable by a
civil penalty in an amount not to exceed the domestic value of the
merchandise. For purposes of the Agreement, the domestic value of
the merchandise will be deemed to be the reference price, as the
signatories agree not to sell the subject merchandise at prices that
are less than the reference price or to ensure that sales of the
subject merchandise are made consistent with the terms of the
Agreement.
C. In addition, the Department will examine the activities of
signatories, their Selling Agents, and any other party to a sale
subject to the Agreement to determine whether any activities
conducted by any party aided or abetted another party's
[[Page 77048]]
violation of the Agreement. If any such parties are found to have
aided or abetted another party's violation of the Agreement, they
shall be subject to the same civil penalties described in section
V.B. above.
Signatories of this Agreement consent to the release of all
information presented to or obtained by the Department during the
conduct of verifications with the U.S. Customs Service and/or the
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Further, through a contractual
arrangement, signatories shall require that the Selling Agent
consent to the release of all information presented to or obtained
by the Department during the conduct of verifications with the U.S.
Customs Service and/or the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
D. The following activities shall be considered violations of
the Agreement:
1. Sales that are at net prices (after rebates, backbilling,
discounts for quality and other claims) that are below the reference
price.
2. Any act or practice which would have the effect of hiding the
real price of the fresh tomatoes being sold (e.g., a bundling
arrangement, discounts/free goods financing package, swap, or other
exchange).
3. Sales that are not in accordance with the terms and
conditions applied by the Department when calculating prices for
transactions involving adjustments due to changes in condition after
shipment as detailed in Appendix D of this Agreement.
4. Selling signatory tomatoes to Canada in a manner that is not
consistent with the requirements of Appendix E of this Agreement.
5. Selling signatory tomatoes for processing in the United
States in a manner that is not consistent with the requirements of
Appendix F of this Agreement.
6. Any other act or practice that the Department or U.S. Customs
Service finds in violation of the Agreement.
VI. Other Provisions
A. In entering into this Agreement the signatories do not admit
that any exports of fresh tomatoes from Mexico are having or have
had an injurious effect on fresh tomato producers in the United
States or have been sold at less than fair value. The signatories
also do not admit that greenhouse, cherry, or any other particular
type of tomatoes are properly considered within the scope of the
underlying investigation.
B. The signatories may withdraw from this Agreement upon ninety
days written notice to the Department.
C. Upon request, the Department will advise any signatory of the
Department's methodology for calculating its export price (or
constructed export price) and normal value which, for purposes of
this Agreement, are described in Appendix B of this Agreement.
Further, the Department reserves the right to modify its methodology
in calculating export price (or constructed export price) and normal
value.
VII. Disclosure and Comment
A. If the Department proposes to revise the reference price as a
result of consultations under this Agreement, not later than three
months prior to the first day of each semi-annual period, the
Department will disclose the results and the methodology of the
Department's calculation of the preliminary reference price
established for that upcoming semi-annual period.
B. Not later than seven days after the date of disclosure under
paragraph VII.A., the parties to the proceeding may submit written
comments to the Department, not to exceed fifteen pages. After
reviewing these submissions, the Department will provide the final
reference price for the upcoming semi-annual period, normally within
thirty days after the date of disclosure under paragraph VII.A.
C. The Department may make available to representatives of each
interested party to the proceeding, under appropriately drawn
administrative protective orders, any business proprietary
information submitted to the Department pursuant to section IV. of
this Agreement, as well as the results of the Department's analysis
of that information.
VIII. Termination
Absent affirmative determinations under the five-year review
provisions of sections 751 and 752 of the Act, the Department
expects to terminate this Agreement and the underlying investigation
no later than five years from the date on which this Agreement is
published in the Federal Register.
IX. Effective Date
The effective date of the Agreement is the date on which it is
published in the Federal Register.
Dated: December 4, 2002.
Faryar Shirzad,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
The following parties hereby certify that the members of their
organization agree to abide by all terms of the Agreement:
Dated: December 4, 2002.
Dr. Rolando Zubia Rivera,
President.
For Caades Sinaloa, A.C.
Dated: December 4, 2002.
Mauricio Castaneda Castro,
President.
For Consejo Agricola de Baja California, A.C.
Dated: December 4, 2002.
Ing. Angel I. Urrutia M.,
President.
For Asociacion Mexicana de Productores de Hortalizas de Invernadero,
A.C.
Dated: December 4, 2002.
Ing. Rafael Orduno Valdez,
President.
For Union Agricola Regional de Sonora, Productores de Hortalizas
Frutas y Legumbres.
Dated: December 4, 2002.
Basilio Gatzionis Torres,
President.
For Confederacion Nacional de Productores de Hortalizas.
Appendix A--Suspension of Antidumping Investigation--Fresh Tomatoes
from Mexico--Reference Price
Consistent with the requirements of section 734(c) of the Act,
to eliminate completely the injurious effect of exports to the
United States and to prevent the suppression or undercutting of
price levels of domestic fresh tomatoes, the Department and
signatory producer/exporters of subject merchandise hereby agree to
adopt the reference prices calculated based on the methodology
outlined in the November 1, 1996, agreement suspending the
antidumping investigation involving fresh tomatoes from Mexico, as
amended on August 14, 1998. See Suspension of Antidumping
Investigation; Fresh Tomatoes from Mexico, 61 FR 56618, 56620
(November 1, 1996), October 28, 1996, Memorandum to Robert S.
LaRussa titled ``The Prevention of Price Suppression or Undercutting
of Price Levels in the Suspension Agreement Covering Fresh Tomatoes
from Mexico,'' and Amendment to the Suspension Agreement on Fresh
Tomatoes from Mexico, 63 FR 43674 (August 14, 1998). Accordingly,
the reference price for the July 1 through October 22 period will be
$0.172 per pound and the reference price for the October 23 through
June 30 period will be $0.2108 per pound.
These reference prices will remain in effect unless modified in
accordance with the provisions of paragraph IV.G. of the Agreement.
The term ``reference price'' refers to the price F.O.B. from the
Selling Agent. The reference price includes all palletizing and
cooling charges incurred prior to shipment from the Selling Agent.
The actual movement or handling expenses beyond the point of entry
into the United States (e.g., McAllen, Nogales, Otay Mesa) must be
added to the reference price and must reflect the cost for an arm's-
length transaction. The charts below contain examples of the minimum
common trucking charges the USDA observed for the 2002 winter
season.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
F.O.B. McAllen to: Los Angeles New York Chicago
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rate ($US)/Per Truckload..................................... $800 $2000 $1200
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
F.O.B. Nogales to: Los Angeles New York Chicago
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rate ($US)/Per Truckload..................................... $800 $3500 $2400
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 77049]]
Parties should refer to http://www.ams.usda.gov/fv/mncs/fvwires.htm
to obtain examples of common trucking charges pertinent
to the current season. Where the Selling Agent sells through an
affiliated party, the transfer price from the Selling Agent to the
affiliate must be at or above the reference price and any subsequent
sale to an unaffiliated party must include the actual cost of
markups (e.g., trucking charges) that reflect arm's-length costs.
For guidance on the trucking-charge markup for such resales, parties
should refer to http://www.ams.usda.gov/fv/mncs/fvwires.htm to
obtain common trucking charges pertinent to the current season.
During the Department's verifications of parties handling
signatory merchandise it will ascertain whether (1) the handling
expenses beyond the point of entry into the United States are added
to the reference price and reflect the actual cost for an arm's-
length transaction and (2) the transfer price from Selling Agents to
their affiliates are at or above the reference price and any
subsequent sale to an unaffiliated party includes markups (e.g.,
trucking charges) that reflect arm's-length costs.
The reference price for each type of box shall be determined
based on the average weights stated in the chart contained in
Appendix C of the Agreement.
Appendix B--Suspension of Antidumping Investigation--Fresh Tomatoes
From Mexico--Analysis of Prices at Less Than Fair Value
A. Normal Value
The cost or price information reported to the Department that
will form the basis of the normal value (NV) calculations for
purposes of the Agreement must be comprehensive in nature and based
on a reliable accounting system (e.g., a system based on well-
established standards and can be tied either to the audited
financial statements or to the tax return filed with the Mexican
government).
1. Based on Sales Prices in the Comparison Market
When the Department bases normal value on sales prices, such
prices will be the prices at which the foreign like product is first
sold for consumption in the comparison market in the usual
commercial quantities and in the ordinary course of trade. Also, to
the extent practicable, the comparison shall be made at the same
level of trade as the export price (EP) or constructed export price
(CEP). The calculation of normal value based on a sales price in the
comparison market will vary depending on whether the comparison is
price-to-EP or price-to-CEP.
2. Constructed Value
When normal value is based on constructed value, the Department
will compute constructed values (CVs) specific growing season
specific based on the sum of each respondent's growing costs for
each type of tomato, plus amounts for selling, general and
administrative expenses (SG&A), U.S. packing costs, and profit. The
Department will collect this cost data for an entire growing season
in order to determine the accurate per-unit CV of that growing
season.
Calculation of CV:
+ Direct Materials
+ Direct Labor
+ Factory overhead
= Cost of Manufacturing
+ Home Market SG&A*
= Cost of Production
+ Profit*
= Constructed Value (CV)
* SG&A and profit are based on home-market sales of the foreign
like product made in the ordinary course of trade.
B. Export Price and Constructed Export Price
EP and CEP refer to the two types of calculated prices for
merchandise imported into the United States. Both EP and CEP are
based on the price at which the subject merchandise is first sold to
a person not affiliated with the foreign producer or exporter.
Calculation of EP:
Gross Unit Price
- Movement Expenses
- Discounts and Rebates
= Export Price (EP)
Calculation of CEP:
Gross Unit Price
- Movement Expenses
- Discounts and Rebates
- Direct Selling Expenses
- Indirect Selling Expenses that relate to commercial activity in
the United States
- The cost of any further manufacture or assembly incurred in the
United States
- CEP Profit
= Constructed Export Price (CEP)
C. Fair Comparisons
To ensure that a fair comparison with normal value is made, the
Department will make adjustments to the price to the first
unaffiliated customer in calculating the EP or CEP. For both EP and
CEP the Department will add packing costs, if not already included
in the price, rebated import duties, and, if applicable, certain
countervailing duties. For both EP and CEP, the Department will
deduct transportation costs and export taxes or duties. In
calculating CEP, the Department will make additional deductions for
commissions, direct selling expenses incurred in selling the
merchandise under investigation in the United States, the cost of
any further manufacture or assembly performed in the United States,
and a portion of profit. In addition, the Department will deduct
indirect selling expenses that relate to commercial activity in the
United States.
Appendix C--Suspension of Antidumping Investigation--Fresh Tomatoes
From Mexico--Box Weights
The Department has the sole authority to make revisions to the
Box Weight Chart used to apply the reference price to particular box
configurations. The reference price for each type of box shall be
determined based on the average weights stated in the chart below.
The Department will coordinate with the U.S. Customs Service in its
collection and review of data for calculating and monitoring box-
specific average weights. To derive representative average weights
for each box type in the chart below, the Department will weigh
twenty sample boxes, randomly chosen without notice, from three
different shippers (i.e., an average weight of sixty boxes for each
box type in the chart).
If the Department determines to revise an average weight figure
based upon information that an average weight on the chart is no
longer accurate, the Department will provide at least fifteen days
notice to signatories (either directly or through their
representative in this proceeding) prior to the effective date of
such revised average weights for purposes of this Agreement. The
Department will determine the revised average weight in accordance
with the procedure described above. Once the Department determines
the revised average weight, the weight will become effective at the
beginning of the next growing season (which will be either July 1 or
October 23 of a year).
In the event that a signatory intends to export subject
merchandise to the United States in a box for which there is no
average weight on the chart, the signatory shall notify the
Department in writing no later than forty-five days prior to the
date of the first exportation of such boxes to the United States.
Signatories can obtain from the Department's website a copy of the
suggested form for submitting this information. See ``Notification
of Intent to Ship Tomatoes in a Specialty Pack'' at http://ia.ita.doc.gov/tomato/suggested_forms/.
This information must be
submitted to the Department in accordance with the filing
instructions set forth under 19 CFR 353.31 and 353.32. The
Department shall allow any interested party to submit written
comments, not to exceed ten pages, on the appropriate average weight
for the box within seven days after the filing of the written
notification by the signatory, and the Department shall inform the
signatory or its representative of the average weight for the box no
later than thirty days after filing of the written notification by
the signatory.
[[Page 77050]]
Box-Weight Chart.--Suspension of Antidumping Investigation on Fresh Tomatoes From Mexico
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reference Price
Avg. Kg. Avg. Lb. -------------------------------------
Box Type* Layers Size weight weight** July 1-Oct. 22 Oct. 23-June 30
$0.172/lb $0.2108/lb
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tomato (cherry)....................... ......................... 12 Baskets............... 6.32 13.93 2.40 2.94
Tomato (cherry)....................... Bulk..................... Bulk..................... 8.13 17.92 3.08 3.78
Tomato................................ 2L....................... 3 x 4.................... ......... ......... ................. .................
Tomato................................ 2L....................... 4 x 4.................... 10.78 23.77 4.09 5.01
Tomato................................ 2L....................... 4 x 5.................... 10.81 23.83 4.10 5.02
Tomato................................ 2L....................... 5 x 5.................... 10.43 22.99 3.96 4.85
Tomato................................ 2L....................... 5 x 6.................... 9.71 21.41 3.68 4.51
Tomato................................ 3L....................... 6 x 6.................... 13.33 29.39 5.05 6.19
Tomato................................ 3L....................... 6 x 7.................... 12.92 28.48 4.90 6.00
Tomato................................ Bulk..................... 25 lbs.***............... 12.15 26.79 4.61 5.65
Tomato................................ 1L....................... Long Box................. 7.41 16.34 2.81 3.44
Tomato (Green)........................ Bulk..................... Small--20 lb............. 8.16 17.99 3.09 3.79
Tomato Grape.......................... Bulk..................... 20 lb.................... ......... ......... ................. .................
Tomato Grape.......................... Bulk..................... 10 lb.................... ......... ......... ................. .................
Tomato Grape.......................... Clam Shell............... 12 Baskets--12 oz........ ......... ......... ................. .................
Tomato Grape.......................... Clam Shell............... 12 Baskets--10 oz........ ......... ......... ................. .................
Tomato Cluster........................ ......................... 11 lb. Euro.............. ......... ......... ................. .................
Tomato Cluster........................ 1L....................... 11 lb. Flat.............. ......... ......... ................. .................
Tomato Club Pack...................... 1L....................... 5 lb..................... ......... ......... ................. .................
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Applicable regardless of production method (e.g., field grown or greenhouse grown).
** Conversion factor from kg. to lb. based on 1 kg.= 2.20462 lbs.
*** Also applicable to 4/7 bushel cartons.
Appendix D--Suspension of Antidumping Investigation--Fresh Tomatoes
from Mexico--Procedures for Making Adjustments to the Sales Price Due
to Certain Changes in Condition After Shipment
The purpose of this appendix is to explain the procedures for
making adjustments to the sales price of signatory tomatoes due to
certain changes in condition after shipment, such that the sales
price for any tomatoes accepted in a lot \1\ do not fall below the
reference price. The procedures outlined in this appendix only apply
if the adjustment reduces the net sales price below the reference
price.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ For these purposes, a lot is defined as a grouping of
tomatoes in a particular shipment that is distinguishable by packing
type.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As explained in Appendix A of the Agreement, the term
``reference price'' refers to the price F.O.B. from the Selling
Agent. The reference price includes all palletizing and cooling
charges incurred prior to shipment from the Selling Agent. The
actual movement or handling expenses beyond the point of entry into
the United States (e.g., McAllen, Nogales, Otay Mesa) must be added
to the reference price and must reflect the cost for an arm's-length
transaction. The charts below contain examples of the minimum common
trucking charges the USDA observed for the 2002 winter season.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
F.O.B. McAllen to: Los Angeles New York Chicago
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rate ($US) / Per Truckload................................... $800 $2000 $1200
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
F.O.B. Nogales to: Los Angeles New York Chicago
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rate ($US) / Per Truckload................................... $800 $3500 $2400
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parties should refer to http://www.ams.usda.gov/fv/mncs/fvwires.htm
to obtain examples of common trucking charges pertinent
to the current season. Where the Selling Agent sells through an
affiliated party, the transfer price from the Selling Agent to the
affiliate must be at or above the reference price and any subsequent
sale to an unaffiliated party must include the actual cost of
markups (e.g., trucking charges) that reflect arm's-length costs.
For guidance on the trucking-charge markup for such resales, parties
should refer to http://www.ams.usda.gov/fv/mncs/fvwires.htm to
obtain common trucking charges pertinent to the current season.
Appendix G of the Agreement outlines specific actions that
signatories should take to ensure that their efforts to abide by the
Agreement are upheld in any claims taken to the U.S. Department of
Agriculture under the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act.
To facilitate the verification of claims for changes in
condition after shipment, the contract between the signatory and the
Selling Agent must establish that claims be resolved and all paper
work be completed within fifteen business days after the USDA
inspection unless the claim is referred to PACA for mediation. When
filing quarterly certifications with the Department, signatories
should report the number of lots on which claims for condition
defects were granted, the total volume of tomatoes destroyed or
donated, and the total value of claims granted. Signatories can
obtain from the Department's website a copy of the suggested form
for submitting the quarterly certification information. See
``Quarterly Certification'' at http://ia.ita.doc.gov/tomato/suggested_forms/
.
A. Contractual Terms for Rejecting All or Part of a Lot
1. A USDA inspection certificate must be provided to support
claims for rejection of all or part of a lot. Further, no
adjustments will be made for failure to meet suitable shipping
conditions unless supported by an unrestricted USDA inspection.
2. If the USDA inspection indicates that the lot has: 1) over 8%
soft/decay condition defects; 2) over 15% of any one condition
defect; or 3) greater than 20% total condition defects, the receiver
may reject the lot or may
[[Page 77051]]
accept a portion of the lot and reject the quantity of tomatoes lost
during the salvaging process. In those instances, price adjustments
will be calculated as described below. For purposes of this
Agreement, a condition defect is any defect listed in the chart in
part A.6. below. When a lot of tomatoes has condition defects in
excess of those outlined above as documented on a USDA inspection
certificate, the documented percentage of the tomatoes with
condition defects are considered DEFECTIVE tomatoes.
3. No adjustments will be made for failure to meet suitable
shipping conditions if the USDA inspection certificate does not
indicate one of the condition thresholds outlined above.
4. The USDA inspection must be called for no more than six hours
from the time of arrival at the destination specified by the
receiver and be performed in a timely fashion thereafter. If there
is more than one USDA inspection on a given lot, the inspection
certificate corresponding to the first inspection is the one that
will be used for making any adjustment to the sales price. However,
if an appeal inspection is conducted, it will supercede the first
inspection, as long as the appeal inspection is requested within a
reasonable amount of time from the first inspection.
The first receiver of the product, regardless of whether that
receiver is acting as an agent or a broker for an unrelated
purchaser or whether the receiver is the unrelated purchaser acting
on its own right, must specify the city/metropolitan area of the
destination of the product. The inspection will take place at the
destination of delivery as specified prior to shipment.
No adjustments will be granted for a USDA inspection at a
destination which is different from the destination specified by the
first receiver of the product. In the event that the first receiver
does not specify the city/metropolitan area of the destination of
the product, the six-hour period within which an inspection may be
requested will begin to run at such time as title to the product
transfers to the unrelated purchaser, for example, upon loading of
the product at the first handler's (importer's) warehouse in an
F.O.B. transaction and upon delivery of the product to the first
buyer's warehouse in a delivered sale.
A person or company shall be considered an agent or broker for
an unrelated purchaser: (1) when that person or company falls within
the description of types of broker operations set forth in 7 CFR
46.27; or (2) have provided a broker's memorandum of sale as set
forth in 7 CFR 46.28(a). The following paragraphs apply if a broker
or dealer is involved in the transaction.
A broker, unlike a dealer, does not take ownership or control of
the tomatoes but arranges for delivery directly to the vendor or
purchaser. Because a broker never takes ownership or control over
the tomatoes, the customer and not the broker may request an
inspection, and only the customer is entitled to any resulting
adjustments. The inspection would take place at the customer's
destination, as specified in the broker's contract with the Selling
Agent.
When a dealer is involved in the sale, the destination of
delivery stated in the contract is where the inspection is to take
place. If the dealer does not specify the destination of delivery,
the default destination of delivery is the warehouse of the Selling
Agent. With respect to a lot of tomatoes that is owned or controlled
by a dealer, it is the responsibility of the dealer to request an
inspection of the tomatoes in his possession in a timely manner, if
he deems it necessary. If the dealer does not request an inspection
in a timely manner (i.e., within six hours from the time of arrival
at the destination specified by the dealer) and resells the tomatoes
to a third party, which does request an inspection, the dealer is
then responsible for all costs and adjustments pertaining to the
inspection and the condition or quality of the tomatoes.
5. Under this Agreement, adjustments to the sales price of
signatory tomatoes will be permitted only for the condition defects
identified in the table below and for no other defects.
Condition Defects
(1) Sunken & Discolored Areas
(2) Sunburn
(3) Internal Discoloration
(4) Freezing Injury
(5) Chilling Injury
(6) Alternaria Rot
(7) Gray Mold Rot
(8) Bacterial Soft Rot
(9) Soft/Decay
6. In calculating the transaction price for lots subject to an
adjustment claim for condition defects, as defined above, the
tomatoes classified as DEFECTIVE will be treated as rejected and as
not having been sold.
B. Contractual Terms for Rejection of Partial Loads
If the lot contains condition defects greater than those
outlined above and the receiver does not reject the entire lot of
tomatoes, the Department will factor certain adjustments into the
transaction price, provided that the following conditions apply:
1. The price invoiced to and paid by the receiver for the
accepted tomatoes must not fall below the reference price.
2. The Selling Agent may reimburse the receiver for actual
destruction costs associated with the DEFECTIVE tomatoes. If
properly documented, these expenses will not be considered in the
calculation of the price of the accepted tomatoes.
3. The Selling Agent may reimburse the receiver for the portion
of freight expenses allocated to the DEFECTIVE tomatoes. If properly
documented, these expenses will not be considered in the calculation
of the price of the accepted tomatoes.
4. If the Selling Agent follows the guidelines outlined below,
it may reimburse the receiver for repacking charges directly
associated with salvaging reconditioning the lot. If properly
documented, these expenses will not be considered in the calculation
of the price of the accepted tomatoes.
a. If the salvaging and reconditioning activity is performed by
a party unaffiliated with the Selling Agent's customer the fee
charged for the service may be reimbursed if the Selling Agent's
customer can provide evidence for such costs i.e., specifically,
proof-of-payment documentation for the invoice from the repacker).
b. If the salvaging and reconditioning activity is performed by
the Selling Agent's customer or a party affiliated with the Selling
Agent, the direct labor costs or, in lieu thereof, one-half of the
ordinary and customary repacking charges may be reimbursed. To
substantiate such costs the Selling Agent's customer or party
affiliated with the Selling Agent must provide detailed records of
the labor cost incurred for repacking or, where applicable, evidence
of the ordinary and customary repacking costs.
5. The Selling Agent may reimburse the receiver for the
inspection fees listed on the USDA inspection certificate. If
properly documented, these expenses will not be considered in the
calculation of the price of the accepted tomatoes.
6. Any reimbursements from, by, or on behalf of the Selling
Agent that are not specifically mentioned in items B.2., B.3., B.4.,
or B.5. above, or that are not properly documented, will be factored
into the calculation of the price for the accepted tomatoes.
7. The receiver may not resell the DEFECTIVE tomatoes. The
receiver may choose to have the DEFECTIVE tomatoes destroyed,
donated to non-profit food banks, or returned to the Selling Agent.
The DEFECTIVE tomatoes may not be sold.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Tomatoes for processing must be handled in accordance with
the guidelines set forth in Appendix F of the Agreement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
8. In addition, for each transaction involving adjustments due
to changes in condition after shipment the Selling Agent must
obtain/maintain the following documents/information:
--Shipper name.
--Shipping manifest.
--Details of the shipper invoice, including invoice number, date,
brand, tomato type, quantity (boxes), and value.
--Documentation supporting the freight expenses incurred for the
original shipment.
--USDA inspection certificate.
--Detailed listing of the expenses incurred in salvaging the non-
DEFECTIVE tomatoes and documentation supporting the expenses.
--Description of the destruction or donation process and
documentation from the landfill or food bank.
--Proof-of-payment documentation for any destruction costs.
--A statement that ``No monies or other compensation was received
for the destroyed or donated tomatoes.''
--Signature of a responsible official at the receiver.
C. Contractual Terms for Rejection of Full Loads
In cases where the receiver has rejected the full lot of
tomatoes based on condition defects, the Selling Agent may choose to
have the entire lot destroyed, donated to non-profit food banks, or
returned. If the entire lot is destroyed or donated, the Selling
Agent will require the receiver to provide the documentation noted
above for partial-lot
[[Page 77052]]
rejections. Further, the Selling Agent may reimburse the receiver
for ordinary and customary expenses that the receiver incurred with
respect to the lot, including those expenses associated with the
destruction or donation process, as long as the Selling Agent
obtains the support documentation specified above under B.8. The
Department will treat such transactions as ``non-sales'' provided
that adequate support documentation is available.
Alternatively, the Selling Agent may sell the entire rejected
lot to another receiver. In that case, the price paid must be not
less than the reference price plus all costs incurred (e.g.,
transportation, commissions, etc.) from the F.O.B. port of entry to
the final receiver. If the final receiver finds that the lot
contains condition defects greater than those outlined above, it
shall follow the directions stated above with respect to rejection
of partial loads.
D. Contractual Terms for Partial vs. Unrestricted Lot Inspections
As explained in part A.1. above, the Department will only allow
adjustments to the transaction price for condition defects if the
USDA inspection is unrestricted. During the time between the call
for inspection and the arrival of the USDA inspector, the receiver
might sell part of the lot and, therefore, by the time the USDA
inspector arrives, that part is not available for inspection. If the
USDA inspector is allowed full access to the partial lot, the
Department will consider this an unrestricted partial-lot
inspection. Alternatively, if the USDA inspector is not allowed full
access to the partial lot, the Department will deem it a restricted
inspection. No adjustments will be made for failure to meet suitable
shipping conditions if the USDA inspection is restricted. For
purposes of this Agreement, when calculating an adjustment for
failure to meet suitable shipping conditions where an unrestricted
partial-lot inspection has taken place, only the portion of the lot
inspected is eligible for adjustment. The portion of the lot that
the receiver sold prior to the inspection will not be eligible for
an adjustment based on the USDA inspection.
For example, before the USDA inspector arrives, the receiver
sells 140 boxes of 5x5s from a lot identified as 160 5x5s on the
invoice. When the USDA inspector arrives the receiver requesting the
inspection provides full access to the partial lot within its
possession. The inspector finds that the partial lot of 20 5x5s has
soft/decay condition defects of 25 percent and notes this on this
inspection certificate. Under the Agreement, only the 20 5x5s are
eligible for an adjustment for failure to meet suitable shipping
conditions, and the 140 5x5s that the receiver already sold will not
be eligible for an adjustment based on the USDA inspection.
Appendix E--Suspension of Antidumping Investigation--Fresh Tomatoes
from Mexico--Contractual Arrangement for Documenting Sales of Signatory
Merchandise To Canada
Based on our experience in this proceeding, it is common
practice for the signatory's Selling Agent to enter the merchandise
into the United States for consumption and then re-export it to
Canada. The purpose of this appendix is to: 1) outline the process
that each signatory of this Agreement must follow to ensure that the
Selling Agent properly documents sales to Canada as such and 2)
ensure that the signatory notifies the Canadian customer that any
resales of its merchandise from Canada into the United States must
be in accordance with the terms of this Agreement.
To document sales of Mexican tomatoes to Canada properly, this
Agreement requires that such transactions be made pursuant to a
contractual arrangement where each signatory requires that the
Selling Agent that facilitates the sale to Canada maintain the
following information in its files:
[sbull] Signatory name and identification number;
[sbull] Shipping manifest;
[sbull] An invoice identifying sale date, brand, tomato type,
quantity (boxes), and value; and
[sbull] Entry documentation from Canadian Customs (i.e., Landing
Form).
If a signatory to the Agreement or its Selling Agent does not
document a sale to Canada in accordance with the procedures outlined
above, the Department will consider the transaction a U.S. sale.
We also require signatories to ensure that the Canadian customer
is notified that any resale of the signatory merchandise from Canada
into the United States must be in accordance with the terms of the
Agreement and that any movement or handling expenses beyond the
point of export from Mexico must be added to the reference price and
must reflect the actual cost for an arm's-length transaction.
Signatories can obtain from the Department's website a copy of the
suggested form for providing such notification. See ``Form for
Notifying Canadian Customer That Resales of Signatory Merchandise
Into the United States Are Covered by the Terms of the December 2002
Suspension Agreement'' at http://ia.ita.doc.gov/tomato/suggested_forms/.
Further, through contractual arrangement each signatory must
require that the Selling Agent maintain evidence in its files to
document that the Canadian customer was notified that any resales of
the signatory merchandise from Canada into the United States must be
in accordance with the terms of the Agreement.
Appendix F--B Suspension of Antidumping Investigation--Fresh Tomatoes
From Mexico--Procedure Signatories Must Follow for Selling Subject
Merchandise for Processing
Sales to the United States of signatory tomatoes for processing
must be:
1. Sold directly to a processor (in other words, the first
purchaser in the United States of tomatoes for processing must be an
actual processor);
2. Accompanied by an ``Importer's Exempt Commodity Form''--Form
FV-6, within the meaning of 7 CFR section 980.501(a)(2) and
980.212(I), should be used for all tomatoes for processing that are
covered by the Florida Marketing Order; tomatoes for processing that
are not covered by the Florida Marketing order (e.g., romas, grape
tomatoes, greenhouse tomatoes and any tomatoes that are entered
during the part of the year that the Florida Marketing Order is not
in effect) must be accompanied by the ``December 2002 Suspension
Agreement--Tomatoes for Processing Exemption Form''. The exempt
commodity form must be presented to U.S. Customs at the time of
crossing at the port of entry into the United States and both the
Selling Agent and the processor must maintain a copy of the form.
3. Shipped in a packing form that is not typical of tomatoes for
the fresh market (e.g., bulk containers in excess of 50 lbs)--
examples of typical fresh-market packing forms are identified in the
Box-Weight Chart in Appendix C of the Agreement; and
4. Clearly labeled on the packaging as ``Tomatoes for
Processing''.
Signatories can obtain from the Department's website an example
of the ``December 2002 Suspension Agreement--Tomatoes for Processing
Exemption Form''. See http://ia.ita.doc.gov/tomato/suggested_forms/.
If a party in the United States facilitates the transaction,
through contractual arrangement each signatory must require that the
party follow the procedures outlined above.
Appendix G--Suspension of Antidumping Investigation--Fresh Tomatoes
From Mexico--Specific Actions That Signatories Should Take to Ensure
That Their Efforts To Abide by the Agreement Are Upheld in Any Claims
Taken to the U.S. Department of Agriculture Under the Perishable
Agricultural Commodities Act
This appendix provides guidance on the specific actions
signatories can take to ensure that their efforts to abide by the
Agreement are upheld in any claims taken to the Department of
Agriculture under the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act
(PACA).
The Chief of the Department of Agriculture's PACA branch, James
R. Frazier, has confirmed that this Agreement is enforceable under
PACA regulations and PACA's claim settlement process. According to
Mr. Frazier, in settling a claim, PACA will uphold actions taken by
a signatory or a signatory's representative (collectively
``signatory'') to comply with the Agreement to the extent that the
sales contract for the transaction at issue establishes that the
sale is subject to the terms of the Agreement. In other words, if,
prior to making the sale, the signatory, or the Selling Agent acting
on behalf of the signatory through a contractual arrangement,
informs the customer that the sale is subject to the terms of the
Agreement and identifies those terms, PACA will recognize the
identified terms of the Agreement as integral to the sales contract.
In particular, signatories should inform their customers that their
contractual agreement to allow defect claim adjustments is limited
in accordance with the Agreement, including:
[sbull] Claims for adjustments must be supported by an
unrestricted USDA inspection called for no more than six hours from
the time of arrival at the receiver and performed in a timely
fashion thereafter.
[[Page 77053]]
[sbull] The USDA inspection must find that the condition defects
exceed the thresholds outlined in Appendix D above.
[sbull] Any price adjustments will be limited to the actual
percentage of condition defects as documented by a USDA inspection
certificate.
[sbull] The price adjustments will be limited to actual
destruction costs, the allocated freight expense, and salvaging and
reconditioning expenses calculated in accordance with Appendix D
above.
[sbull] The customer may not resell any defective tomatoes.
Instead, they must be destroyed, returned or donated to a non-profit
food bank. Signatories should provide a copy of the Agreement to any
customer which may be unfamiliar with its terms or which has
questions about those terms.
The process by which a signatory could provide evidence to PACA
that its sales contracts were made subject to the terms of the
Agreement including, in particular, those terms listed above is
outlined below.
[sbull] The signatory should maintain written documentation
demonstrating that it had informed its customers and the customers
accepted that the sales were subject to the terms of the Agreement
prior to issuing the invoice. A signed contract to that effect would
be the best evidence of that fact; however, a purchase by the
customer after being informed of the relevance of the Agreement is
evidence of acceptance.
[sbull] The signatory should send letters to its customers via
registered mail, return receipt requested, informing the customers
that, as a signatory to the Agreement, all of the signatory's sales
are subject to the terms of the Agreement and that, by purchasing
from them, the buyer agrees to those terms. The letter should also
indicate that the signatory's sales personnel do not have authority
to alter the terms of the Agreement.
[sbull] In addition, the signatory should include a statement on
its order confirmation sheets that its contract with the buyer is
subject to the terms of the Agreement as detailed in the signatory's
``pre-season'' letter and maintain a copy of the order confirmations
and fax receipts demonstrating that they were sent to the customer
prior to making the sale. If the sale is to a first-time purchaser
that did not receive a ``pre-season'' letter, a letter should be
supplied to the buyer prior to making a sale.
[sbull] The signatory should instruct its sales personnel to
inform customers making purchases by telephone or at the loading
dock that the sale is subject to the terms of the Agreement and its
restrictions on price adjustments and, by purchasing from them, the
buyer agrees to those terms. In fact, the sales personnel should
provide a copy of the letter to the customer and, ideally, have the
customer acknowledge receipt of the letter, in writing, prior to
making the sale. Such an established practice will help to ensure
that even new customers are informed properly of the terms of sale
prior to completing a contract.
PACA does not require any one particular form of written
documentation but USDA officials have confirmed that, if signatories
maintain written evidence demonstrating that their customers were
informed that their sales were made subject to the terms of the
Agreement prior to sale, PACA will recognize those terms as part of
the sales contract.
[FR Doc. 02-31618 Filed 12-11-02; 3:41 pm]