[Federal Register: May 11, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 90)]
[Notices]
[Page 24852-24856]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr11my05-93]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION
Sentencing Guidelines for United States Courts
AGENCY: United States Sentencing Commission.
ACTION: Notice of submission to Congress of amendments to the
sentencing guidelines effective November 1, 2005.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to its authority under 28 U.S.C. 994(p), the
Commission has promulgated amendments to the sentencing guidelines,
policy statements, commentary, and statutory index. This notice sets
forth the amendments and the reason for each amendment.
DATES: The Commission has specified an effective date of November 1,
2005, for the amendments set forth in this notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Courlander, Public Affairs
Officer, 202-502-4590. The amendments set forth in this notice also may
be accessed through the Commission's Web site at http://www.ussc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Sentencing Commission is
an independent agency in the judicial branch of the United States
Government. The Commission promulgates sentencing guidelines and policy
statements for Federal sentencing courts pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 994(a).
The Commission also periodically reviews and revises previously
promulgated guidelines pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 994(o) and generally
submits guideline amendments to Congress pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 994(p)
not later than the first day of May each year. Absent action of
Congress to the contrary, submitted amendments become effective by
operation of law on the date specified by the Commission (generally
November 1 of the year in which the amendments are submitted to
Congress).
Notice of proposed amendments was published in the Federal Register
on February 23, 2005 (see 70 FR 8868). The Commission held a public
hearing on the proposed amendments in Washington, DC, on April 12,
2005. On April 29, 2005, the Commission submitted these amendments to
Congress and specified an effective date of November 1, 2005.
Authority: 28 U.S.C. 994(a), (o), and (p); USSC Rule of Practice
and Procedure 4.1.
Ricardo H. Hinojosa,
Chair.
1. Amendment: Chapter Two, Part B, Subpart 1 is amended by adding
at the end the following new guideline and accompanying commentary:
``Sec. 2B1.6. Aggravated Identity Theft
(a) If the defendant was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. 1028A,
the guideline sentence is the term of imprisonment required by statute.
Chapters Three (Adjustments) and Four (Criminal History and Criminal
Livelihood) shall not apply to that count of conviction.
Commentary
Statutory Provision: 18 U.S.C. 1028A. For additional statutory
provision(s), see Appendix A (Statutory Index).
Application Notes
1. Imposition of Sentence.--
(A) In General.--Section 1028A of title 18, United States Code,
provides a mandatory term of imprisonment. Accordingly, the guideline
sentence for a defendant convicted under 18 U.S.C. 1028A is the term
required by that statute. Except as provided in subdivision (B), 18
U.S.C. 1028A also requires a term of imprisonment imposed under this
section to run consecutively to any other term of imprisonment.
(B) Multiple Convictions Under Section 1028A.--Section 1028A(b)(4)
of title 18, United States Code, provides that in the case of multiple
convictions under 18 U.S.C. 1028A, the terms of imprisonment imposed on
such counts may, in the discretion of the court, run concurrently, in
whole or in part, with each other. See the Commentary to Sec. 5G1.2
(Sentencing on Multiple Counts of Conviction) for guidance regarding
imposition of sentence on multiple counts of 18 U.S.C. 1028A.
2. Inapplicability of Chapter Two Enhancement.--If a sentence under
this guideline is imposed in conjunction with a sentence for an
underlying offense, do not apply any specific offense characteristic
for the transfer, possession, or use of a means of identification when
determining the sentence for the underlying offense. A sentence under
this guideline accounts for this factor for the underlying offense of
conviction, including any such
[[Page 24853]]
enhancement that would apply based on conduct for which the defendant
is accountable under Sec. 1B1.3 (Relevant Conduct). `Means of
identification' has the meaning given that term in 18 U.S.C.
1028(d)(7).
3. Inapplicability of Chapters Three and Four.--Do not apply
Chapters Three (Adjustments) and Four (Criminal History and Criminal
Livelihood) to any offense sentenced under this guideline. Such
offenses are excluded from application of those chapters because the
guideline sentence for each offense is determined only by the relevant
statute. See Sec. Sec. 3D1.1 (Procedure for Determining Offense Level
on Multiple Counts) and 5G1.2.''.
The Commentary to Sec. 3B1.3 captioned ``Application Notes'' is
amended in Note 1 by inserting ``Definition of `Public or Private
Trust'.--'' before `` `Public or private trust' refers to'', and by
striking the second paragraph; by redesignating Notes 2 through 4 as
Notes 3 through 5, respectively; and by inserting after Note 1 the
following:
``2. Application of Adjustment in Certain Circumstances.--
Notwithstanding Application Note 1, or any other provision of this
guideline, an adjustment under this guideline shall apply to the
following:
(A) An employee of the United States Postal Service who engages in
the theft or destruction of undelivered United States mail.
(B) A defendant who exceeds or abuses the authority of his or her
position in order to obtain unlawfully, or use without authority, any
means of identification. `Means of identification' has the meaning
given that term in 18 U.S.C. 1028(d)(7). The following are examples to
which this subdivision would apply: (i) An employee of a state motor
vehicle department who exceeds or abuses the authority of his or her
position by knowingly issuing a driver's license based on false,
incomplete, or misleading information; (ii) a hospital orderly who
exceeds or abuses the authority of his or her position by obtaining or
misusing patient identification information from a patient chart; and
(iii) a volunteer at a charitable organization who exceeds or abuses
the authority of his or her position by obtaining or misusing
identification information from a donor's file.''.
Section 3D1.1 is amended by striking subsection (b) and inserting
the following:
``(b) Exclude from the application of Sec. Sec. 3D1.2-3D1.5 the
following:
(1) Any count for which the statute (A) specifies a term of
imprisonment to be imposed; and (B) requires that such term of
imprisonment be imposed to run consecutively to any other term of
imprisonment. Sentences for such counts are governed by the provisions
of Sec. 5G1.2(a).
(2) Any count of conviction under 18 U.S.C. 1028A. See Application
Note 2(B) of the Commentary to Sec. 5G1.2 (Sentencing on Multiple
Counts of Conviction) for guidance on how sentences for multiple counts
of conviction under 18 U.S.C. 1028A should be imposed.''.
The Commentary to Sec. 5G1.2 captioned ``Application Notes'' is
amended in Note 2 by inserting ``(A) In General.''--before ``Subsection
(a) applies''; by inserting ``and 18 U.S.C. 1028A (requiring a
mandatory term of imprisonment of either two or five years, based on
the conduct involved, and also requiring, except in the circumstances
described in subdivision (B), the sentence imposed to run consecutively
to any other term of imprisonment)'' after ``imprisonment)''; by
striking ``Note, however,'' and all that follows through ``Sec.
3624(e).''; and by adding at the end the following:
``(B) Multiple Convictions Under 18 U.S.C. 1028A.--Section 1028A of
title 18, United States Code, generally requires that the mandatory
term of imprisonment for a violation of such section be imposed
consecutively to any other term of imprisonment. However, 18 U.S.C.
1028A(b)(4) permits the court, in its discretion, to impose the
mandatory term of imprisonment on a defendant for a violation of such
section ``concurrently, in whole or in part, only with another term of
imprisonment that is imposed by the court at the same time on that
person for an additional violation of this section, provided that such
discretion shall be exercised in accordance with any applicable
guidelines and policy statements issued by the Sentencing Commission *
* *''.
In determining whether multiple counts of 18 U.S.C. 1028A should
run concurrently with, or consecutively to, each other, the court
should consider the following non-exhaustive list of factors:
(i) The nature and seriousness of the underlying offenses. For
example, the court should consider the appropriateness of imposing
consecutive, or partially consecutive, terms of imprisonment for
multiple counts of 18 U.S.C. 1028A in a case in which an underlying
offense for one of the 18 U.S.C. 1028A offenses is a crime of violence
or an offense enumerated in 18 U.S.C. 2332b(g)(5)(B).
(ii) Whether the underlying offenses are groupable under Sec.
3D1.2 (Multiple Counts). Generally, multiple counts of 18 U.S.C. 1028A
should run concurrently with one another in cases in which the
underlying offenses are groupable under Sec. 3D1.2.
(iii) Whether the purposes of sentencing set forth in 18 U.S.C.
3553(a)(2) are better achieved by imposing a concurrent or a
consecutive sentence for multiple counts of 18 U.S.C. 1028A.
(C) Imposition of Supervised Release.--In the case of a consecutive
term of imprisonment imposed under subsection (a), any term of
supervised release imposed is to run concurrently with any other term
of supervised release imposed.
See 18 U.S.C. 3624(e).''.
Appendix A (Statutory Index) is amended by inserting after the line
referenced to 18 U.S.C. 1028 the following:
``18 U.S.C. 1028A 2B1.6''.
Reason for Amendment: This amendment implements sections 2 and 5 of
the Identity Theft Penalty Enhancement Act, Public Law 108-275, 118
Stat. 831 (``the Act''), which create two new criminal offenses at 18
U.S.C. 1028A and direct the Sentencing Commission to expand the upward
adjustment at Sec. 3B1.3 (Abuse of Position of Trust/Special Skill).
This amendment also provides guidance to the courts on imposing
sentences for multiple violations of section 1028A.
The Act creates a new offense at 18 U.S.C. 1028A(a)(1) that
prohibits the unauthorized transfer, use, or possession of a means of
identification of another person during, or in relation to, specific
enumerated felonies. These felonies consist of various types of fraud,
including mail and wire fraud in connection with passports, visas and
other immigration, nationality, and citizenship laws, programs under
the Social Security Act, and the acquisition of firearms. A conviction
under section 1028A(a)(1) carries a two-year mandatory term of
imprisonment that must run consecutively to any other term of
imprisonment, including the sentence for the underlying felony
conviction. The Act also creates a new offense at 18 U.S.C. 1028A(b)(1)
that prohibits the unauthorized transfer, use, or possession of a means
of identification of another person during, or in relation to, specific
felonies enumerated in 18 U.S.C. 2332b(g)(5)(B) (``federal crimes of
terrorism''). Section 1028A(b)(1) provides a five-year mandatory term
of imprisonment that must run consecutively to any other term of
imprisonment, including the sentence for the underlying felony
conviction. As described below, section
[[Page 24854]]
1028A(b)(4) creates an exception to the requirement for consecutive
terms of imprisonment in cases involving multiple violations of the
statute sentenced at the same time.
First, in response to the creation of these new criminal offenses,
the amendment creates a new guideline at Sec. 2B1.6 (Aggravated
Identity Theft). This guideline is patterned after Sec. 2K2.4 (Use of
a Firearm, Armor-Piercing Ammunition, or Explosive During or in
Relation to a Certain Crimes). Because the new offenses carry a fixed,
mandatory consecutive term of imprisonment, the new guideline, as does
Sec. 2K2.4, provides that the guideline sentence is the term of
imprisonment required by statute. To avoid unwarranted double-counting,
the amendment contains an application note that prohibits the
application of any specific offense characteristic for the transfer,
possession, or use of a means of identification when determining the
sentence for the underlying offense in cases in which a sentence under
Sec. 2B1.6 is imposed in conjunction with a sentence for an underlying
offense. Also, consistent with Sec. 2K2.4, the new guideline at Sec.
2B1.6 contains an application note that provides that adjustments under
Chapters Three and Four are inapplicable to sentences under this
guideline.
Second, in response to the directive in section 5 to amend Sec.
3B1.3 (Abuse of Trust or Use of Special Skill) to include a ``defendant
[who] exceeds or abuses the authority of his or her position in order
to obtain unlawfully or use without authority any means of
identification,'' the Commission created Application Note 2 to Sec.
3B1.3 to include such defendants within the scope of the guideline. The
application note contains several examples to illustrate the types of
conduct intended to be within the scope of the new provision.
Third, the amendment adds a number of provisions at appropriate
guidelines in order to provide guidance to courts in accordance with
section 2 of the Act (18 U.S.C. 1028A(b)(4)). That section states that
``a term of imprisonment imposed on a person for violation of this
section may, in the discretion of the court, run concurrently, in whole
or in part, only with another term of imprisonment that is imposed by
the court at the same time on that person for an additional violation
of this section, provided that such discretion shall be exercised in
accordance with any applicable guidelines and policy statements issued
by the Sentencing Commission * * *.'' The amendment states a general
rule, at Sec. 5G1.2 (Sentencing on Multiple Counts of Conviction),
Application Note 2(B), providing that the court has discretion to
impose concurrent or consecutive, or partially concurrent and partially
consecutive, terms of imprisonment for multiple violations of 18 U.S.C.
1028A. A non-exhaustive list of factors for courts to consider in
making this determination is provided, including the nature and
seriousness of the underlying offenses and whether the offenses would
be groupable under Sec. 3D1.2 (Multiple Counts).
Finally, the amendment modifies Sec. 3D1.1 (Procedure for
Determining Offense Level on Multiple Counts) to make clear that
section 1028A offenses are excluded from the general grouping rules in
Sec. Sec. 3D1.2-3D1.5 and makes conforming additions and changes to
the new guideline at Sec. 2B1.6 (Aggravated Identity Theft) in
Application Note 1 and Sec. 3D1.1(b)(1) and (2).
2. Amendment: Section 2R1.1(a) is amended by striking ``10'' and
inserting ``12''.
Section 2R1.1(b) is amended by striking subdivision (2) and
inserting the following:
``(2) If the volume of commerce attributable to the defendant was
more than $1,000,000, adjust the offense level as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Volume of commerce (apply the greatest) Adjustment to offense level
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(A) More than $1,000,000.................. add 2.
(B) More than $10,000,000................. add 4.
(C) More than $40,000,000................. add 6.
(D) More than $100,000,000................ add 8.
(E) More than $250,000,000................ add 10.
(F) More than $500,000,000................ add 12.
(G) More than $1,000,000,000.............. add 14.
(H) More than $1,500,000,000.............. add 16.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For purposes of this guideline, the volume of commerce attributable
to an individual participant in a conspiracy is the volume of commerce
done by him or his principal in goods or services that were affected by
the violation. When multiple counts or conspiracies are involved, the
volume of commerce should be treated cumulatively to determine a
single, combined offense level.''.
The Commentary to Sec. 2R1.1 captioned ``Application Notes'' is
amended by striking Note 1 and inserting the following:
``1. Application of Chapter Three (Adjustments).--Sections 3B1.1
(Aggravating Role), 3B1.2 (Mitigating Role), 3B1.3 (Abuse of Position
of Trust or Use of Special Skill), and 3C1.1 (Obstructing or Impeding
the Administration of Justice) may be relevant in determining the
seriousness of the defendant's offense. For example, if a sales manager
organizes or leads the price-fixing activity of five or more
participants, the 4-level increase at Sec. 3B1.1(a) should be applied
to reflect the defendant's aggravated role in the offense. For purposes
of applying Sec. 3B1.2, an individual defendant should be considered
for a mitigating role adjustment only if he were responsible in some
minor way for his firm's participation in the conspiracy.''.
The Commentary to Sec. 2R1.1 captioned ``Application Notes'' is
amended in Note 2 by striking the first sentence and inserting the
following:
``Considerations in Setting Fine for Individuals.--In setting the
fine for individuals, the court should consider the extent of the
defendant's participation in the offense, the defendant's role, and the
degree to which the defendant personally profited from the offense
(including salary, bonuses, and career enhancement).''.
The Commentary to Sec. 2R1.1 captioned ``Background'' is amended
in the second paragraph by striking the ``The Commission'' and all that
follows through ``general deterrence.''; in the third paragraph by
striking ``confinement of six months or longer'' and inserting ``some
period of confinement''; and in the last paragraph by striking the last
sentence.
Reason for Amendment: This amendment responds to the Antitrust
Criminal Penalty Enhancement and Reform Act of 2004, Pub. L. 108-237
(the ``Act''). The Act increased the statutory maximum term of
imprisonment for antitrust offenses under 15 U.S.C. 1 and 3(b) from
three to ten years. The amendment responds to congressional concern
about the seriousness of antitrust offenses and provides for antitrust
penalties that are more proportionate to those for sophisticated frauds
sentenced under Sec. 2B1.1 (Larceny, Embezzlement, and Other Forms of
Theft; Offenses Involving Stolen Property; Property Damage or
Destruction; Fraud and Deceit; Forgery; Offenses Involving Altered or
Counterfeit Instruments Other than Counterfeit Bearer Obligations of
the United States). The Commission has long recognized the similarity
of antitrust offenses to sophisticated frauds.
The amendment increases the base offense level for antitrust
offenses in Sec. 2R1.1 (Bid-Rigging, Price-Fixing or Market-Allocation
Agreements Among Competitors) to level 12. The higher base offense
level ensures that penalties
[[Page 24855]]
for antitrust offenses will be coextensive with those for sophisticated
frauds sentenced under Sec. 2B1.1 and recognizes congressional concern
about the inherent seriousness of antitrust offenses. The penalties for
sophisticated fraud have been increased incrementally due to a series
of amendments to Sec. 2B1.1, while no commensurate increases for
antitrust offenses had occurred. Raising the base offense level of
Sec. 2R1.1 helps restore the historic proportionality in the treatment
of antitrust offenses and sophisticated frauds.
The ``volume of commerce'' table at Sec. 2R1.1(b)(2) is amended to
provide up to 16 additional offense levels for the defendant whose
offense involves more than $1,500,000,000, while the new table's first
threshold is raised from $400,000 to $1,000,000. The new volume of
commerce table: (1) Recognizes the depreciation in the value of the
dollar since the table was last revised in 1991; (2) responds to data
indicating that the financial magnitude of antitrust offenses has
increased significantly; and (3) provides greater deterrence of large
scale price-fixing crimes.
Application Note 1 to Sec. 2R1.1 is amended to emphasize the
potential relevance of such Chapter Three enhancements as Sec. 3B1.1
(Aggravating Role), Sec. 3B1.3 (Abuse of Position of Trust or Use of
Special Skill), and Sec. 3C1.1 (Obstructing or Impeding the
Administration of Justice) in determining the appropriate sentence for
an antitrust offender. Application Note 2 also is amended to highlight
the potential relevance of the defendant's role in the offense in
determining the amount of fine to be imposed. Finally, the amendment
strikes outdated background commentary.
3. Amendment: Section 2A2.4 is amended by striking the Commentary
captioned ``Background''.
The Commentary to Sec. 2B1.1 captioned ``Application Notes'' is
amended in Note 15 in the first sentence by inserting ``involving
fraudulent conduct that is'' after ``establishes an offense''; and in
the second sentence by inserting ``involves fraudulent conduct that''
after ``the offense''.
Section 2B3.3(c)(1) is amended by inserting ``; Fraud Involving the
Deprivation of the Intangible Right to Honest Services of Public
Officials; Conspiracy to Defraud by Interference with Governmental
Functions'' after ``Official Right''.
Section 2C1.3(c)(1) is amended by inserting ``; Fraud Involving the
Deprivation of the Intangible Right to Honest Services of Public
Officials; Conspiracy to Defraud by Interference with Governmental
Functions'' after ``Official Right''.
Section 2C1.8(c)(1) is amended by inserting ``; Fraud Involving the
Deprivation of the Intangible Right to Honest Services of Public
Officials; Conspiracy to Defraud by Interference with Governmental
Functions'' after ``Official Right''.
The Commentary to Sec. 2D1.1 captioned ``Application Notes'' is
amended in Note 5 in the first paragraph by striking ``whether a
greater quantity of the analogue is needed to produce a substantially
similar effect on the central nervous system as'' and inserting
``whether the same quantity of analogue produces a greater effect on
the central nervous system than''.
The Commentary to Sec. 2D1.1 captioned ``Application Notes'' is
amended in Note 19 by striking ``(b)(5)(A)'' each place it appears and
inserting ``(b)(6)(A)''; in Note 20 by striking ``(b)(5)(B) or (C)''
and inserting ``(b)(6)(B) or (C)''; and by striking ``(b)(5)(C)'' and
inserting ``(b)(6)(C)''; and in Note 21 by striking ``(b)(6)'' each
place it appears and inserting ``(b)(7)''.
The Commentary to Sec. 2D1.1 captioned ``Background'' is amended
in the ninth paragraph by striking ``(b)(5)(A)'' and inserting
``(b)(6)(A)''; in the last paragraph and by striking ``(b)(5)(B) and
(C)'' and inserting ``(b)(6)(B) and (C)''.
Section 2D1.11(e) is amended in subdivision (1) by striking ``2271
L or more of Gamma-butyrolactone;'' and inserting ``1135.5 L or more of
Gamma-butyrolactone;'';
in subdivision (2) by striking ``At least 681.3 L but less than
2271 L of Gamma-butyrolactone;'' and inserting ``At least 340.7 L but
less than 1135.5 L of Gamma-butyrolactone;'';
in subdivision (3) by striking ``At least 227.1 L but less than
681.3 L of Gamma-butyrolactone;'' and inserting ``At least 113.6 L but
less than 340.7 L of Gamma-butyrolactone;'';
in subdivision (4) by striking ``At least 159 L but less than 227.1
L of Gamma-butyrolactone;'' and inserting ``At least 79.5 L but less
than 113.6 L of Gamma-butyrolactone;'';
in subdivision (5) by striking ``At least 90.8 L but less than 159
L of Gamma-butyrolactone;'' and inserting ``At least 45.4 L but less
than 79.5 L of Gamma-butyrolactone;'';
in subdivision (6) by striking ``At least 22.7 L but less than 90.8
L of Gamma-butyrolactone;'' and inserting ``At least 11.4 L but less
than 45.4 L of Gamma-butyrolactone;'';
in subdivision (7) by striking ``At least 18.2 L but less than 22.7
L of Gamma-butyrolactone;'' and inserting ``At least 9.1 L but less
than 11.4 L of Gamma-butyrolactone;'';
in subdivision (8) by striking ``At least 13.6 L but less than 18.2
L of Gamma-butyrolactone;'' and inserting ``At least 6.8 L but less
than 9.1 L of Gamma-butyrolactone;'';
in subdivision (9) by striking ``At least 9.1 L but less than 13.6
L of Gamma-butyrolactone;'' and inserting ``At least 4.5 L but less
than 6.8 L of Gamma-butyrolactone;'';
and in subdivision (10) by striking ``Less than 9.1 L of Gamma-
butyrolactone;'' and inserting ``Less than 4.5 L of Gamma-
butyrolactone;''.
The Commentary to Sec. 2K2.1 captioned ``Statutory Provisions'' is
amended by striking ``(e)-(i), (k)-(o)'' and inserting ``(e)-(h), (j)-
(n)''.
Section 2M6.1 is amended by striking ``(a)(4)*'' in subsection
(b)(1)(A) and inserting ``(a)(4)(A)''; and by striking ``*Note: The
reference to ``(a)(4)'' should be to ``(a)(4)(A)'.''.
Section 3D1.2(d) is amended by striking ``2C1.7,''.
The Commentary to Sec. 5D1.2 captioned ``Application Notes'' is
amended in Note 2 by inserting ``Limitation on'' before ``Applicability
of Statutory''.
Section 8C2.1(a) is amended by striking ``, 2C1.7''.
Appendix A (Statutory Index) is amended by striking the following:
``18 U.S.C. 924(i) 2K2.1
18 U.S.C. 924(j)(1) 2A1.1, 2A1.2
18 U.S.C. 924(j)(2) 2A1.3, 2A1.4
18 U.S.C. 924(k)-(o) 2K2.1'',
and inserting the following:
``18 U.S.C. 924(i)(1) 2A1.1, 2A1.2
18 U.S.C. 924(i)(2) 2A1.3, 2A1.4
18 U.S.C. 924(j)-(n) 2K2.1''.
Reason for Amendment: This ten-part amendment consists of technical
and conforming amendments to various guidelines.
First, this amendment deletes unnecessary background commentary in
Sec. 2A2.4 (Obstructing or Impeding Officers).
Second, this amendment makes minor clarifying amendments to
Application Note 15 in the fraud guideline, Sec. 2B1.1, to make clear
that, in order for the cross reference at Sec. 2B1.1(c)(3) to apply,
the conduct set forth in the count of conviction must establish a fraud
or false statement-type offense.
Third, this amendment makes technical amendments to several
guidelines to conform to changes made in the public corruption
guidelines in the 2004 amendment cycle (see Appendix C to the
Guidelines Manual, Amendment 666). Specifically, the proposed amendment
corrects title references to Sec. 2C1.1 in Sec. Sec. 2B3.3(c)(1),
[[Page 24856]]
2C1.3(c)(1), and 2C1.8(c)(1) and strikes references to Sec. 2C1.7 in
Sec. Sec. 3D1.2(d) and 8C2.1.
Fourth, this amendment clarifies Application Note 5 in the drug
guideline, Sec. 2D1.1, regarding drug analogues. The current note
suggests that drug analogues are less potent than the drug for which it
is an analogue. However, by statute, analogues can only be the same or
more potent.
Fifth, this amendment redesignates incorrect references in a number
of Application Notes in the drug guideline, Sec. 2D1.1.
Sixth, this amendment conforms Sec. 2D1.11 (Unlawfully
Distributing, Importing, Exporting or Possessing a Listed Chemical;
Attempt or Conspiracy) to changes made in the drug guideline, Sec.
2D1.1, in the 2004 amendment cycle (see Appendix C to the Guidelines
Manual, Amendment 667). Specifically, the proposed amendment amends the
Chemical Quantity Table in Sec. 2D1.11(e) so that the amount of gamma-
butyrolactone (GBL), at any particular offense level, is the amount
that provides a 100 percent yield of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB).
Seventh, this amendment updates the statutory provisions in Sec.
2K2.1 (Unlawful Receipt, Possession, or Transportation of Firearms or
Ammunition; Prohibited Transactions Involving Firearms or Ammunition)
to account for redesignations of 18 U.S.C. 924 offenses.
Eighth, this amendment corrects a typographical error in Sec.
2M6.1 (Weapons of Mass Destruction).
Ninth, this amendment corrects the title to Sec. 5C1.2 (Limitation
on Applicability of Statutory Minimum Sentence in Certain Cases) in
Application Note 2 of Sec. 5D1.2 (Terms of Supervised Release.).
Tenth, this amendment corrects Appendix A (Statutory Index) to
account for redesignations of 18 U.S.C. 924 offenses.
[FR Doc. 05-9378 Filed 5-10-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2211-01-P